Funding Pips vs FundedNext
Compare Funding Pips and FundedNext on targets, drawdown, trading rules, platforms, payouts, scaling and country restrictions.
Contents
- The 30-second verdict
- Which exact programs are being compared?
- Funding Pips vs FundedNext comparison table
- Fees and the real burden of passing
- Drawdown: the same percentages do not mean the same rule
- Funding Pips daily-loss formula
- FundedNext daily-loss formula
- Trading permissions and hidden constraints
- News trading
- Weekend holding
- Funding Pips Profit Concentration Policy
- Striking System and FundedNext risk cap
- Platforms, leverage and execution costs
- Rewards and fee reimbursement
- Scaling: two structurally different paths
- Country access and KYC
- Which firm fits which trading style?
- Red flags before purchase
- Purchase-day checklist
- Final verdict
- Verification and change log
If you are choosing between Funding Pips and FundedNext, there is no universal winner. In a like-for-like comparison of their $100,000 two-step programs, both use 8% and 5% profit targets, a 5% daily loss limit and a 10% static maximum-loss limit. The meaningful differences appear in the mechanics: Funding Pips requires three trading days per phase and offers several reward cycles, while FundedNext permits weekend holding on Stellar 2‑Step, refunds the challenge fee earlier and offers a direct Scale-Up path with a stated ceiling of $4 million.
The correct decision depends on more than whichever checkout price is lower today. You need to compare the daily-loss baseline, exact-limit treatment, news restrictions, weekend policy, platform availability, reward conditions, fee-refund timing, KYC and country eligibility.
Written by: MyFxKit Content Team
Technical review: MyFxKit Technical Team
Official sources last checked: September 11, 2026
Snapshot ID: MFK-CMP-FP-FN-2026-09-11-01

This comparison covers simulated CFD evaluation programs and performance-reward accounts. It does not compare live brokerage accounts and is not investment advice. Prices, rules, platforms, promotions and country access can change. Recheck the official rule page, agreement and checkout for your exact configuration before paying.
The 30-second verdict
Funding Pips may fit better if you value three minimum trading days per phase, higher stated evaluation leverage on forex, a choice between MT5, cTrader and Match-Trader, or several reward-cycle options. The trade-off is a more involved Master-stage rule set: news windows, the temporary weekend-holding restriction, Profit Concentration Policy, Striking System and a registration-fee refund delayed until the fourth reward.
FundedNext may fit better if you need weekend holding, MT4, fee reimbursement with the first eligible reward, or a direct four-month Scale-Up plan. The trade-off is five minimum trading days per phase, a 21-day first withdrawal under the standard option and additional funded-stage controls including a 3% maximum-risk-at-any-time rule and special treatment of news-trading profit.
Neither conclusion overrides country access. FundedNext expressly restricts residents of Iran. Funding Pips describes access through supported and restricted countries but does not provide one simple public list covering every platform and case. Obtain written confirmation for nationality, residence, KYC and payout access when your jurisdiction is uncertain.
Which exact programs are being compared?
The baseline comparison uses:
- Funding Pips 2 Step Standard, $100,000 account
- FundedNext Stellar 2‑Step, $100,000 account, Standard 21 Days reward option
These are reasonably comparable because both have two evaluation phases, 8% and 5% targets, a 5% daily-loss headline, a 10% static maximum loss and no direct deadline for reaching the target. One-step, Flex, Pro, Zero, Lite and add-on configurations are excluded from the main columns because they change the risk structure, reward share or trading permissions. See prop-firm challenge types before comparing a different model.

Funding Pips vs FundedNext comparison table
| Criterion | Funding Pips 2 Step Standard | FundedNext Stellar 2‑Step |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline size | $100,000 | $100,000 |
| Evaluation phases | 2 | 2 |
| Phase 1 target | 8% | 8% |
| Phase 2 target | 5% | 5% |
| Daily loss | 5% of higher opening balance or equity | 5% of initial balance, reset daily |
| Maximum loss | 10% static | 10% static |
| Exact limit touch | Breach | Can trigger automatic restriction; treat as breach |
| Minimum trading days | 3 per phase | 5 per phase |
| Time limit | None; separate 30-day inactivity rule | None; separate 60-day inactivity rule |
| Base reward structure | Cycle-dependent, 60%–100% | 80% on Standard 21 Days |
| First reward request | Depends on selected cycle | Day 21 on Standard option |
| Registration-fee refund | Fourth Master reward | First eligible reward |
| Platforms | MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader | MT4, MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader |
| News during evaluation | Holding/managing allowed; purposeful news trading prohibited | Allowed; funded-stage news-profit rule applies |
| Weekend holding during evaluation | Allowed | Allowed |
| Weekend holding after passing | Temporarily unavailable; positions auto-close | Allowed on Stellar 2‑Step |
| Iran-resident access | Written confirmation required | Expressly restricted |
The core figures come from the official Funding Pips 2 Step Standard rules, Funding Pips onboarding guide, FundedNext Stellar 2‑Step page, FundedNext trading objectives and FundedNext CFD Challenge Terms.
Fees and the real burden of passing
At the September 11, 2026 snapshot, FundedNext publicly displayed $549.99 for the $100,000 Stellar 2‑Step configuration. A reproducible public Funding Pips price for the equivalent account was not available without a location-, session- or checkout-dependent state, so it is recorded as live checkout required rather than guessed.
This means the article cannot honestly declare a price winner. Compare both checkouts at the same time and record:
- Base price and discounted price
- Final payment currency
- Tax and payment-processing costs
- Platform or add-on charges
- Fee-refund trigger and expected time to reach it
- Usable loss budget for your strategy
Both programs require a combined nominal target of 13% across two phases. Funding Pips has a minimum of six trading days across the evaluation; FundedNext has a minimum of ten. That difference changes the earliest possible completion date, but it does not predict pass probability. A trader who forces trades to finish sooner can turn the lower minimum into a disadvantage.
Use the prop challenge cost guide to normalize the final fee into one currency and compare it against usable drawdown rather than account-label size.

Drawdown: the same percentages do not mean the same rule
On a $100,000 account, both firms state a $10,000 static maximum-loss allowance. The overall floor is $90,000 and does not trail upward after profits. Open P&L matters, so an unrealized loss can breach the account before the position closes. Test your own cases with the prop-firm drawdown calculator.
Funding Pips daily-loss formula
Funding Pips takes the higher of opening balance and opening equity as the daily baseline:
Daily baseline = max(opening balance, opening equity)
Daily floor = daily baseline − 5% of daily baseline
If opening balance is $105,000 and opening equity is $107,000, the baseline is $107,000. Five percent is $5,350, so equity cannot touch $101,650 that day. If opening balance is $100,000 and opening equity is $99,000, the baseline is $100,000 and the daily floor is $95,000.
The reset occurs at 00:00 platform time, UTC+3. Floating P&L and closed results count. An open profitable position at reset can therefore lift the baseline; if that profit retraces, the account can approach the daily floor even while it remains above its original starting balance.
Funding Pips explicitly states that touching either limit, even momentarily, is a violation. Recovery after the touch does not reverse the breach.
FundedNext daily-loss formula
FundedNext defines the daily-loss amount as 5% of initial balance and resets the calculation at 00:00 server time. Realized and unrealized P&L, swaps and commissions count:
Daily loss allowance = 5% × initial balance
Daily floor = start-of-day balance − daily loss allowance
For the $100,000 program, the daily-loss amount is $5,000. FundedNext's terms say reaching or exceeding the DLL or MLL threshold can activate automated account restriction. MyFxKit therefore treats an exact touch as a breach for risk-planning purposes. A trader should maintain a buffer for spread, commission, swaps and slippage.
Read the complete prop-firm drawdown guide and floating-loss rule guide before relying on a headline percentage.
Trading permissions and hidden constraints
News trading
Funding Pips prohibits purposely trading news in both evaluation and Master stages. During evaluation, traders can hold and manage positions through news without a restricted execution window. On the Master Account, profits from trades opened or closed within five minutes before or after high-impact news may be deducted. Speeches use a separate window, and a swing exception applies to positions opened at least five hours before the event.
The distinction matters: a profit deduction can itself cause daily- or maximum-loss consequences. Partial closes can flag the entire order. Always use the economic calendar in the Funding Pips dashboard because that is the firm's stated reference.
FundedNext describes news trading as allowed on Stellar 2‑Step, but the funded-stage configuration displays News Trading Profit: 40%. This is not the same as saying the overall reward share is 40%. A news trader should obtain a calculation example for the exact account and understand which event window and profit portion the rule affects. See the news-trading prop-firm guide.
Weekend holding
Funding Pips permits weekend holding during evaluation. A temporary update effective January 29, 2026 prohibits it on 2 Step Standard Master Accounts. Open positions are automatically closed over the weekend; the forced closure is not itself a hard breach, but the resulting price, slippage and P&L still matter.
FundedNext permits weekend holding in both the Stellar 2‑Step Challenge and FundedNext Account. That gives swing traders more freedom, but weekend-gap and Monday-spread risks remain. Compare the rule with the weekend-holding guide.
Funding Pips Profit Concentration Policy
For newly created Funding Pips evaluation accounts of $25,000 and above from June 27, 2026, one trade idea contributing more than 60% of the phase target triggers an additional reward condition. The evaluation does not fail. The resulting Master Account must instead complete four profitable days before every reward request; each qualifying day requires at least 0.5% net realized profit on initial Master balance.
Funding Pips groups one trade, concurrent same-direction positions on the same instrument and certain re-entries into a single trade idea. Traders cannot avoid the rule merely by splitting one idea into several tickets.
Striking System and FundedNext risk cap
On applicable Funding Pips Master Accounts above $25,000 with the 8% target, a trade idea reaching 1.2% combined floating loss records a strike. Consequences escalate from profit deduction to reduced reward share and, on the fourth warning, account breach. Warnings are cumulative across reward cycles.
FundedNext's Stellar 2‑Step page displays a 3% maximum risk at any time rule for the funded-stage configuration. Traders with correlated positions need to evaluate combined exposure rather than treating every ticket as independent. The consistency-rule guide explains how concentration controls differ from drawdown.
Platforms, leverage and execution costs
The Funding Pips Account Workspace guide lists MT5, cTrader and Match-Trader. The FundedNext platform page lists MT4, MT5, cTrader and Match-Trader. If MT4 is essential, FundedNext has the advantage in this pair. If you use automation, confirm the purchase configuration: FundedNext may require a paid EA/VPS add-on, so MetaTrader availability is not by itself permission to run an EA at no additional cost.
Funding Pips states evaluation leverage of 1:100 on forex, 1:30 on metals, 1:10 on energies, 1:20 on indices and 1:2 on crypto. Crypto drops to 1:1 on Master accounts, and temporary dynamic leverage applies to Master metals, energies and indices.
FundedNext displays 1:30 on forex, 1:10 on indices, 1:15 on commodities, 1:1 on crypto and 1:2 on stocks for Stellar 2‑Step. Higher leverage is not automatically better; it raises possible notional exposure but does not improve fill quality or risk capacity.
Funding Pips states $5 per lot on standard forex and metals, no commission on energies and indices, and 0.04% on crypto. Test both programs for spread, round-turn commission, swap, slippage, contract size, symbol naming, order latency and lot limits during the sessions your strategy actually trades. See EA-compatible prop firms before selecting automation options.
Rewards and fee reimbursement
Funding Pips offers four reward cycles on 2 Step Standard:
| Cycle | Stated share | Core condition |
|---|---|---|
| Weekly | 60% | Request seven days after first Master trade |
| Bi-Weekly | 80% | Every 14 calendar days |
| On Demand | 90% | 35% consistency and at least 2% profit |
| Monthly | 100% | 30 days, 35% consistency and seven qualifying profitable days |
The Monthly structure applies to eligible evaluation accounts purchased from August 15, 2026 and resets its consistency and profitable-day counters after a processed reward. A larger advertised percentage therefore does not always mean an easier payout route.
Funding Pips refunds the original registration fee for 2 Step Standard upon the fourth Master reward. The official Get Started guide confirms that the fourth-reward refund does not apply to every Funding Pips model.
FundedNext's official reward-share guide states 80% for Standard 21 Days, 60% for the 3 Days option and 90% for On-Demand. A Lifetime Reward 95% add-on raises the share to 95%; that figure is not the free base share for every account.
Under the standard Stellar 2‑Step configuration, the first request opens after 21 days and later requests follow every 14 days. The challenge fee is refundable with the first eligible performance reward, materially earlier than the fourth-reward trigger at Funding Pips.
The FundedNext reward page claims that 99.99% of submitted requests are processed within 24 hours. This is a company-published processing claim, not independent proof that every account, KYC case or payment rail will be paid within that time.

Scaling: two structurally different paths
Funding Pips promotes Prime as a separate route funded by moving part of a reward. Prime has an 80% daily reward model and 10% scaling milestones up to a stated $2 million. It also uses a smart end-of-day trailing floor. Do not present this as automatic scaling of the original 2 Step Standard Master Account; it is a separate account path with different mechanics.
The FundedNext Scale-Up guide states that accounts purchased or reset from January 12, 2026 can be reviewed every four months for a potential 40% increase, up to $4 million. Conditions include at least 10% accumulated growth over four consecutive months, two performance rewards and a profitable final cycle.
The higher ceiling does not prove a faster real-world route. Compare the time, reward and profitability conditions needed to reach each milestone, not only the final advertised allocation.
Country access and KYC
FundedNext expressly lists Iran among restricted jurisdictions on its Stellar 2‑Step page. Opening the website or reaching checkout does not override that disclosure. A resident of Iran should not purchase the account expecting KYC and reward access.
The FundedNext KYC guide describes post-challenge identity verification, liveness checks and proof of address when requested. KYC must reach Approved status and the current guide describes a 90-day renewal cycle. The post-pass Stellar guide describes account issuance after KYC in approximately 24–48 hours.
Funding Pips describes platform access through currently supported countries, with separate restrictions for MT5, cTrader and Match-Trader. That language does not confirm eligibility for every nationality or residence. Master onboarding includes KYC, Responsible Trading Team review of up to two working days, agreement signing and a further risk-connection stage of up to two working days.
Confirm all of the following in writing when access is uncertain:
- Nationality and country of residence
- Accepted identity and proof-of-address documents
- Platform availability in that country
- Payment method and payout destination
- Whether the payout account must be held in the trader's own name
Never use false residence information, another person's documents or a VPN to bypass restrictions.
Which firm fits which trading style?

| Trader requirement | Lean | Why | Final check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fewer minimum trading days | Funding Pips | Three per phase | Concentration and Master rules |
| Weekend swing trading | FundedNext | Weekend holding permitted | Gap and reset exposure |
| MT4 required | FundedNext | MT4 officially listed | Country and add-on access |
| Higher evaluation forex leverage | Funding Pips | Stated 1:100 | Master leverage and real risk |
| Earlier fee reimbursement | FundedNext | First eligible reward | Reward and KYC eligibility |
| Flexible reward-cycle choice | Funding Pips | Four timing/share options | Consistency and minimum profit |
| Direct conventional Scale-Up | FundedNext | Four-month 40% review | Qualification conditions |
| Iran resident | Neither without eligibility | Express restriction or unresolved access | Written confirmation before payment |
This is a fit matrix, not a universal ranking. If weekend holding or MT4 is essential, a discount cannot compensate for its absence. If minimum days matter, the shorter requirement only helps when the Master-stage rules remain compatible with the strategy. Use the prop-firm rule-burden guide to weight rules by importance.
Red flags before purchase
- Declaring Funding Pips cheaper without a reproducible checkout price
- Presenting 100% or 95% as an unconditional base reward share
- Treating evaluation and post-pass news or weekend rules as identical
- Writing “5% drawdown” without the baseline, reset time and open-equity treatment
- Ignoring Profit Concentration, strikes or maximum simultaneous risk
- Assuming country access because the website or payment page opens
- Treating a brand's processing-speed claim as a payout guarantee
Some MyFxKit outbound links may have a commercial purpose. That cannot change a value, remove a restriction or manufacture a universal winner. Our evidence and update rules are explained in the MyFxKit methodology.
Purchase-day checklist
- Open the exact $100,000 configurations at the same time.
- Record final price, currency, taxes, discounts and add-ons.
- Confirm targets, minimum days, daily loss, maximum loss and reset time.
- Separate evaluation news and weekend rules from post-pass rules.
- Verify platform, symbols, leverage, commission, swap and lot limits.
- Record reward cycle, share, minimum profit, consistency and fee-refund timing.
- Confirm country, KYC, proof of address and payout route in writing.
- Save date-stamped screenshots of checkout and rules and review the MyFxKit change log.
Final verdict
The programs share the same phase targets and headline loss percentages, so the decision lives in the mechanics. Funding Pips is the stronger fit for traders prioritizing fewer minimum days, higher evaluation forex leverage and a selectable reward schedule, provided its Master news/weekend rules, Profit Concentration Policy, Striking System and later fee refund suit the strategy.
FundedNext is the stronger fit for weekend swing traders, MT4 users, traders wanting the fee returned with the first eligible reward, or those preferring a direct Scale-Up path, provided they accept five minimum days per phase, the standard 21-day first cycle, the funded news-profit treatment and maximum-risk rule.
The correct order of decision is country access first, drawdown formula second, trading permissions and rewards third, price last. Open the MyFxKit profiles for Funding Pips and FundedNext, the related comparisons FTMO vs Funding Pips and FTMO vs FundedNext, and the prop-firm comparison hub alongside the official rules.
Verification and change log

| Date | Verified change | Comparison effect |
|---|---|---|
| September 11, 2026 | Official $100K program snapshot captured | Baseline for this edition |
| August 15, 2026 | Funding Pips Monthly reward conditions for new purchases | 100% share requires additional conditions |
| June 27, 2026 | Funding Pips Profit Concentration Policy began for affected evaluations | Can add Master reward requirements |
| January 29, 2026 | Temporary Funding Pips Master weekend restriction | Swing flexibility leans toward FundedNext |
| January 12, 2026 | Updated FundedNext reward and Scale-Up structure | Share and scaling depend on purchase/reset date |
This page is reviewed monthly and whenever a material fee, program, rule, reward, platform or access change is identified. Submit documented corrections through the corrections policy.
Further reading
- PropiaFunds vs FundedNextCompare PropiaFunds and FundedNext on 50K two-step pricing, targets, drawdown, platforms, payouts, trading rules and country access.
- FTMO vs FundedNextCompare FTMO and FundedNext on targets, drawdown formulas, fees, platforms, payout cycles, scaling and country access before choosing a challenge.
- FTMO vs Funding PipsCompare FTMO and Funding Pips on targets, drawdown formulas, fees, platforms, payouts, trading permissions and country access.