Skip to main content
MyFxKit
MyFxKit
Leaderboard

FundedNext vs Funding Pips

First firm
  • Alpha Capital
  • FTMO
  • FundedNext
  • Funding Pips
  • Invest Prop
  • Moneta Funded
  • Propia
  • Sarmayegozarebartar
  • The5ers
  • Volt Funded
  • ZoraFX
Second firm
  • Alpha Capital
  • FTMO
  • FundedNext
  • Funding Pips
  • Invest Prop
  • Moneta Funded
  • Propia
  • Sarmayegozarebartar
  • The5ers
  • Volt Funded
  • ZoraFX
FundedNextStellar 2-Step$100,00078TC ScoreWins 1 category
Funding Pips2 Step Standard$100,00090TC ScoreWins 5 categories

6 of 24 criteria have a clear winner

FundedNext compared with Funding Pips
CriterionFundedNextStellar 2-Step · $100,000Funding Pips2 Step Standard · $100,000
At a glance
TC Score77.9890BEST on this criterion
Plans at this firm2211
Cost
Price$549.99$549BEST on this criterion
Commission per lot$5$5
Typical spread4.51.8BEST on this criterion
Account size$100,000$100,000
Getting paid
Profit split80%80%
First payout after21 days5 daysBEST on this criterion
Payout cadenceBi-weeklyOn demand
Risk limits
Daily drawdown limit5%5%
Total drawdown limit10%10%
Static drawdownYesYes
Single-day profit cap100%100%
Per-trade loss capNo capNo cap
Targets
Phase 1 target8%8%
Minimum trading days53BEST on this criterion
Trading conditions
Max leverage1:1001:100
Tradable symbols150BEST on this criterion130
Expert advisors allowedYesYes
News trading allowedYesYes
Weekend holding allowedYesYes
Company
Company statusunknownunknown
Founded20222022
Persian site & supportnot recordednot recorded

Every number comes from the two plans named above — click a plan name to change it. The last few rows describe the company, not the plan. A BEST tag appears only where better is genuinely unambiguous; where it depends on how you trade, like leverage or company status, both values are shown with no winner. An em dash means we have not verified it, not that the firm is worse.

Common questions

Which is cheaper for a $100,000 account, FundedNext or Funding Pips?

They are effectively level: for a $100,000 account FundedNext charges $549.99 and Funding Pips $549 — a $0.99 gap on a $549.99 fee, which is not a reason to pick either. Their real differences are the profit split and the risk rules.

Which keeps you more of your profit, FundedNext or Funding Pips?

Neither — both pay the trader 80% of profits. On every $1,000 you withdraw they hand you the same amount, so this row does not separate them.

How soon can you withdraw with FundedNext or Funding Pips?

Funding Pips pays sooner: 5 days against 21 days for FundedNext. After that, FundedNext pays bi-weekly and Funding Pips pays on demand. This is the wait for the FIRST withdrawal only — it says nothing about how quickly later payouts arrive.

How do the drawdown rules differ between FundedNext and Funding Pips?

Both cap daily loss at 5% and total loss at 10%. Total drawdown is measured from your starting balance in both cases, so profit you make does not drag the limit up behind you.

Which challenge is easier to pass, FundedNext or Funding Pips?

Both ask for 8% in phase one. FundedNext requires a minimum of 5 trading days against 3 for Funding Pips. Those numbers only tell you what it takes to pass, though — the drawdown rules above decide whether you get the room to reach them at all, and passing is a different problem from keeping the account afterwards.

Should you choose FundedNext or Funding Pips?

Across the 24 criteria we compare, FundedNext leads on 1 and Funding Pips on 5; 12 are identical between them and 6 are not verified on both sides (TC Score 77.98 against 90). That is a count, not a recommendation: entry cost matters most if you expect to retake the challenge a few times, while the profit split and drawdown rules matter most once you are funded. Read the rows that match how you actually trade rather than the total.

Other comparisons